MPAICON 2026

Rules for Abstract Submissions

Note: Abstracts that are not submitted properly will receive an administrative reject and will not be reviewed.

1.   Abstracts must be submitted properly. The online system is a database, with data fields (title, author 1, author 2, author 3, etc.) that are used to generate the published abstracts. Therefore, pay careful attention to the submission instructions and to the submission process, including spelling, capitalization, author names, etc. No abstract will be accepted through emails or any other mode of communication.
2.   The title of the abstract must be in title case, not all capital letters.
3.   3.All abstracts must include the required headers listed below:
   • Introduction: a brief discussion of the background or rationale of the study and/or the question addressed
   • Methods: the experimental approach, materials, and methods used in the study
   • Results: the data and results obtained in the study
   • Conclusions: the conclusions and/or implications of the results
4.   Abstract Limits:
   • Number of authors: 10
   • Abstract Title: 50 Words Maximum
   • Abstract Content: 350 words Maximum
5.   You must include formatting (e.g. italicizing genes), Greek letters and special symbols, e.g. °C (degree sign), superscripts, etc. Data must be reported in narrative format in the abstract submission.
6.   No tables, figures, or references should be included in the abstract.
   Abstracts for the MPAICON 2026 will be published in the e-Souvenirs. To ensure that the meeting abstracts are the same format as journal abstracts, authors should save tables, figures, and references for their presentations and/or posters as well as for full manuscript submissions.
   • The same abstract submitted to the MPAICON 2026 must not have been published elsewhere (including the web), submitted to another publication, or submitted to another meeting that occurs prior to the MPAICON 2026.
   • Abstracts that have been submitted to meetings that occur earlier, should be revised, e.g., with additional data, before submitting to the MPAICON 2026
   • No change in abstract will be allowed once submitted
   • Submission of abstract carries with it an obligation to present the accepted abstract in person without any change in Sceintific content during the allotted time in MPAICON 2026.
7.   Your abstract will be rated using four criteria:
   • Originality and Clarity
   • Novelty
   • Scientific Merit/Rigor
   • Appropriate conclusions

Abstract Review

Abstracts for the MPAICON 2026 will undergo blind review, i.e., the reviewers will not be able to see the names or the affiliations of the abstract author(s). Please refrain from including identifiers in the body of your abstract. The Program Committee will be able to see author and affiliation information after review, during the assignment of platform presentations.

Summary

Grounds for abstract rejection are:

• Failure to follow directions in 1-7.
• The abstract is not eligible for MPAICON 2026.
• The abstract contains no scientific data and/or has only a promise of future data.
• Duplicate abstracts are submitted.
8.   Preference for POSTER/ORAL Presentation must be mentioned at the time for submission of abstract. Though the final decision of the Abstract Review Committee will be binding.The selection of Abstract for POSTER/ORAL Presentation would be informed to the submitting author on the registered e-mail ID. The submitting author must register for conference in order to present his work mentioned in the abstract.
9.   One Registered delegate can submit only one abstract.

The five most common reasons for rejection are:

• Previously presented/published data
• Poor organization/clarity
• No novel information
• Insufficient scientific quality
• Insufficient data